On dating apps, everyone wants to break patriarchy and end capitalism.
Tinder bios announces “swipe rightly if left ”warning the possible right wingers and Modi Bhakts. Cis-men write “die hard feminist”And wear a nose pin. The plans for a perfect date are “overthrow the government“, and almost every Tinder photo of progressive people includes one where they are at a protest – preferably holding a popular alliteration sign,”Fuck fascism”.
There has been a noticeable shift in the visual metrics of the dating market – everyone is “wake up“, or seems to be. It’s virtually impossible in this current cultural moment to date someone from a dating app and not know who they’re voting for. It seems like the platitude,”personal is political”Received new life – a life where the desires of the chamber are deeply invested in the performance of daily politics.
On the one hand, such appearances point to a politically conscious generation that believes in revolutionary politics. While at the other end of the spectrum, most suspect that such positioning is just a performance or more to the point, as a friend from college puts it, “using militant language to get laid”.
While my friend doesn’t seem optimistic about the spurious alignment between activism and sex culture, oddly enough, dating app users feel pressured to announce their policies. It does a wonder; dating apps on the verge of mass political organization? Do people who want “fucking fascism“, Fooling around in the hope of building up a frame? Does this executive building really happen in fancy cafes and music festivals? And especially, can we dismantle capitalism and have good sex?
Speaking to users of dating apps like Tinder and Bumble, the majority of them express their discomfort in meeting profiles who use current political modes. Soumya, 24, notes how people on dating apps use “politically correct language, especially feminism, to enlighten womenWhile Radif, 23, wearily observes the disturbing pretensions of people who romanticize protests as venues and render traumas and people’s lived experiences as an aesthetic.
While there seems to be a consensus around the insipidity to appear “wake up”Of these apps, few have also noted how the language of political correctness becomes a safe haven to appear acceptable in a culture that values popular academic jargon like heteropatriarchy and hegemony. A, 24 (Anonymous) notes that there is a significant section of people on dating apps, and society in general, who shame others for not using the “correct”Terminologies. They believe it often acts as a deterrent, rather than a site for knowledge sharing, and cripples trust.
Meetali, 23, finds this shame unfortunate and more often than not she has found herself dating people who, although they seem ignorant of the “law“, appear genuine and kind in their conduct and actions.
Read also : Who would you drag to the right? : Dating apps and the basis of their problematic algorithms
Nonetheless, most agree that the so-called digital activism on dating apps is just a signal of virtue, a plot to appear “superior»As observed by R (Anonymous), 25, and as one of the sources of a To cut article notes, to “mansplain Marx”.
When my friend noticed that people started “using militant language to fuckWe all laughed in our two-bedroom apartment, sipping cold rum from plastic cups. A moment later I was struck by how this is what flirting looks like today – if you write #DalitLivesMaterial on your bio, then I’m hot for you. This performative politics and the use of serious issues as a token to get laid is very disgusting and unpleasant, and the dating platforms, owned and operated by corporate giants, are realistically the latter. place for a revolution.
Apps like Tinder and Bumble work in the neoliberal market. The commodification of love and desire is a symptom of unethical consumerism, where we treat humans as consumer goods and judge them by the value of the pleasure they provide. In fact, the swipe feature on most dating apps was designed to mimic a deck of playing cards.
These dating apps are known as Uber for sex, or virtual markets where we almost buy sex. No matter how inclusive and progressive their ads are, casting trans women or battling consent issues, dating apps only formalize societal inequalities: of caste, class, gender, and capital. It seems desperate, if not vicious, to profile people and choose them based on their desirability, an algorithm that is rarely favorable to marginalized identities like Dalit women in India and black women around the world.
While dating apps and cybersex have made it easier for many queer identities to access desire and intimacy, like Michel Foucault History of sexuality recalls that the deployment of a field of new possible fields for the exploration of sexuality does not necessarily imply its liberation.
After recognizing this, appearing “wake up”Leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. As we’re all on dating apps, swiping left and right for hours on end, it almost becomes an affront to use the platform and its dropdowns to choose “activism“like his passions right next to”house parties”.
Handle note how “the sexuality allowed by Tinder… is constituted by the power of the financialized market… and supports the current economic organization of life by affections experienced or not as joyful, but generally represented as such, if only to deceive us”. Dating apps like Tinder and Bumble don’t challenge anything, take anything apart, or offer anything. What they allow is easy (for some) access to sex from a correspondence catalog, while the market economy thrives.
Whenever I went through a breakup, I turned to dating apps. Whenever my friends have found a lull in their sex lives, they have also turned to dating apps. Whenever any of us got bored, we always turned to dating apps. The ubiquity of traffic on these applications is and continues to be routine.
As we all talk about systemic collapse and neoliberalism, our powerless resignation to the larger structures of capital – I can only think of what Christina dhananraj noted – “apps don’t kill castes, we do ”. And they don’t kill capitalism, fascism and all the rest either. ‘isms‘that appear so blissfully over Tinder’s 500 character limit.
Read also : Disagree, Cupid! Misogyny in online dating
Featured Image: Ritika Banerjee for Feminism in India